The Obama Administration kicked off the Supreme Court case on health care remodel Friday with the brief defending the 2010 law's many controversial feature -- the requirement that individuals buy health insurance. The supervision offered several legal arguments in support of the provision, contending that it is a valid practice under Congress's powers to regulate widespread commerce as well as to collect taxes. The legal research was no surprise--the supervision has been creation similar arguments for scarcely two years in the reduce courts, with churned results.
Will these arguments be persuasive to the justices? Will the Supreme Court uphold the health remodel law?
Labor Economics
No comments:
Post a Comment